The decline of living standards is taking place all throughout Western societies. It hasn’t truly shown itself yet due to large deficit spending, but these type of policies will be the demise. Incredible how much power climate craziness policies and ideals are destroying our future prosperity.
Value At Risk, now where did I see that old chestnut first time round? Ah, that's it, to measure the riskiness of the banking system c. 2005-6, that's it.
Excellent article about another absurdity of government design. It would seem the only people to profit from this idea will be the NVaR consultants developing boilerplate reports sold to the corporates for tens of thousands of Euros.
Remember, in the Green Fetish Dungeon, there are no safe words. You can scream, "offset," "sequester," or "Greta" as loud as you want, but the beatings will continue.
“the production of solar panels, batteries, and hydrogen—all centerpieces of Europe’s climate agenda—requires enormous amounts of fresh water. “ AND insane amounts of mining, processing and energy. WHICH is precisely why those technologies are unlikely to help us in any substantial way decarbonise. This would not be a bad outcome. On the contrary! It would help us steer our effort in a sensible direction. Nuclear for example, being less resource intensive, has been shown to help decarbonise and balance the grid. But its benefits are not factored in by the market alone nor can we build these big complex projects without the backing of the state. ! The market doesn’t know physics or climate science. We do !
There is no such thing as an "eco-friendly technology". The powers-that-be have done a great job convincing themselves that there is, though. Unfortunately they are missing the bigger picture: climate change is not the problem; it's merely one of many symptoms of the problem, which is ecological overshoot. Of course, there is no technology, no product that anyone can invent to reverse the catastrophic decline of wildlife and habitat, or reverse the pervasive global poisoning of the planet with PCBs, dioxins, microplastics, PFAS, and more. So they focus on "climate" and pretend that solar panels, wind turbines, etc. will somehow do something about climate change, ignoring that all these technologies simply make the problem--overshoot--far, far worse. No salmon needs a dam ("clean, hydro energy!!"); no sage-grouse needs a solar panel; no pronghorn needs a lithium mine; no deep-sea marine creature a deep-sea mining machine.
All efforts to "tech" our way out of climate change will just make things worse and worse, and accelerate the cost to the natural world of this ecocidal way of life. The sixth mass extinction is well underway and will likely conclude by the end of this century with the extinction of humans as well as many other species on the brink. And by the time we realize we can't eat solar panels, drink dams, and breathe wind turbines, it will be far too late.
"Net zero" is just a euphemism for "not zero" and it is an absolute boondoggle. But people are desperate--as they should be--+3C will be the end of our way of life as we know it, and will be upon us within just a few decades if the poison, or the species loss, or the fresh water wars don't get us first.
Who has been stealing much of my wages all my working life?
I've tracked down the information to argue that since 1979 Gov and corp have been silencing and impoverishing regular people. If Synagogue of Satan Zionist and other minions had left well enough alone, you would not believe how much better we all and our nation would have been. Listen for taste, read for truth.
The purpose of a system is what it does, what does Green Do, what will this do? Transfer money to Davos and starve Europe of Water. Never been in trouble in a desert, have we? Well. You will be.
You cannot accept the thought of your own bearing you malice can you? You are now the Americans before we awoke to their malice, Trump is consequence as much as change agent.
If NVaR ends up penalizing sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and clean tech for their water intensity, how exactly does Europe plan to build a resilient industrial base for the energy transition without undermining its own capacity to produce?
The decline of living standards is taking place all throughout Western societies. It hasn’t truly shown itself yet due to large deficit spending, but these type of policies will be the demise. Incredible how much power climate craziness policies and ideals are destroying our future prosperity.
That bill will come due at some point…
If ever there was a reason to short the euro, this is the piece de resistance
Markets always have a way of punishing stupidity.
The Euro has been climbing vs USD.
indeed, but this is a long-term perspective, not a trading one
Value At Risk, now where did I see that old chestnut first time round? Ah, that's it, to measure the riskiness of the banking system c. 2005-6, that's it.
Loved the photo of the bureaucrats and other pin-stripped suits in the plane. Removed from reality and spending other people’s money…
Peak smugness.
👍👍 article!
Why do I not pity the Euros?
Thank you!
Calling it a fetish is about right - self-inflicted pain and misery for no discernible gain.
Controlling Energy by controlling CO2 wasn’t enough, now they want to control water by owning future rain. Q: will they build dams to capture rain?
Excellent article about another absurdity of government design. It would seem the only people to profit from this idea will be the NVaR consultants developing boilerplate reports sold to the corporates for tens of thousands of Euros.
Remember, in the Green Fetish Dungeon, there are no safe words. You can scream, "offset," "sequester," or "Greta" as loud as you want, but the beatings will continue.
Only vegan leather whips!
“the production of solar panels, batteries, and hydrogen—all centerpieces of Europe’s climate agenda—requires enormous amounts of fresh water. “ AND insane amounts of mining, processing and energy. WHICH is precisely why those technologies are unlikely to help us in any substantial way decarbonise. This would not be a bad outcome. On the contrary! It would help us steer our effort in a sensible direction. Nuclear for example, being less resource intensive, has been shown to help decarbonise and balance the grid. But its benefits are not factored in by the market alone nor can we build these big complex projects without the backing of the state. ! The market doesn’t know physics or climate science. We do !
There is no such thing as an "eco-friendly technology". The powers-that-be have done a great job convincing themselves that there is, though. Unfortunately they are missing the bigger picture: climate change is not the problem; it's merely one of many symptoms of the problem, which is ecological overshoot. Of course, there is no technology, no product that anyone can invent to reverse the catastrophic decline of wildlife and habitat, or reverse the pervasive global poisoning of the planet with PCBs, dioxins, microplastics, PFAS, and more. So they focus on "climate" and pretend that solar panels, wind turbines, etc. will somehow do something about climate change, ignoring that all these technologies simply make the problem--overshoot--far, far worse. No salmon needs a dam ("clean, hydro energy!!"); no sage-grouse needs a solar panel; no pronghorn needs a lithium mine; no deep-sea marine creature a deep-sea mining machine.
All efforts to "tech" our way out of climate change will just make things worse and worse, and accelerate the cost to the natural world of this ecocidal way of life. The sixth mass extinction is well underway and will likely conclude by the end of this century with the extinction of humans as well as many other species on the brink. And by the time we realize we can't eat solar panels, drink dams, and breathe wind turbines, it will be far too late.
"Net zero" is just a euphemism for "not zero" and it is an absolute boondoggle. But people are desperate--as they should be--+3C will be the end of our way of life as we know it, and will be upon us within just a few decades if the poison, or the species loss, or the fresh water wars don't get us first.
Who has been stealing much of my wages all my working life?
I've tracked down the information to argue that since 1979 Gov and corp have been silencing and impoverishing regular people. If Synagogue of Satan Zionist and other minions had left well enough alone, you would not believe how much better we all and our nation would have been. Listen for taste, read for truth.
AI generated audio overview of article;
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/9fc1b713-4c44-49bd-9c29-04fc3fe09744/audio
"Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2223:, 14th July 2025, State's Organized Planned Disempowerment of the American Citizen"
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2223
Feedback welcomed.
God Bless., Steve
The purpose of a system is what it does, what does Green Do, what will this do? Transfer money to Davos and starve Europe of Water. Never been in trouble in a desert, have we? Well. You will be.
You cannot accept the thought of your own bearing you malice can you? You are now the Americans before we awoke to their malice, Trump is consequence as much as change agent.
Malice Oblige.
They mean Harm.
If NVaR ends up penalizing sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and clean tech for their water intensity, how exactly does Europe plan to build a resilient industrial base for the energy transition without undermining its own capacity to produce?
Results = far less people.
Malice Oblige.
There’s no contradiction, simply deception.